March 16, 2011
101 Constitution Avenue
NW Suite 800W
Washington, DC 20001
The Honorable Bob Abbey
Dear Director Abbey:
As associations who represent the interests of millions of responsible motorized recreation enthusiasts, we oppose the new Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) Wild Lands policy. We have questions concerning the definition of Wild Lands, designations , and implementation plans, as they relate to motorized recreation within Secretarial Order 3310. Moreover, we seek to clarify indications that you believe there is no grass-roots opposition to this order. We, the undersigned, believe this new designation may severely restrict the ability of our members to responsibly recreate nonpublic lands managed by the BLM.
According to a Department of the Interior (DOI) press release, dated December 23, 2010, “Secretarial Order 3310 directs the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), based on the input of the public and local communities through its existing land management planning process, to designate appropriate areas with wilderness characteristics under its jurisdiction as “Wild Lands” and to manage them to protect their wilderness values”
While the DOI release states that the new designation is intended to protect the wilderness values of certain lands, many of our members remain concerned that this new label may lead to confusion among users on the differences between Wilderness, Wilderness Study Areas (WSAs) and Wild Lands.
We seek answers to the following questions as they relate to responsible motorized recreation:
Furthermore, we seek to clarify indications that you believe there is no grass-roots opposition to the Wild Lands designation. A Denver Post article (enclosed) entitled “Western Republicans dicy Obama wilderness policy”, states:
In an interview, Abbey said planning has already begun, and designation of the first wild lands could occur as soon as this summer in Idaho, Wyoming and Alaska. He denied that the plan is unpopular in the West, citing letters of support from recreation and conversation groups and the outdoor industry.
The same article indicated you believe people are hearing “rhetoric” from Western lawmakers, but no grass-roots opposition.
As associations who represent responsible motorized enthusiasts, we strongly disagree with any assertion that there is no grass-roots opposition. To the contrary, there is considerable and growing opposition to Wild Lands from those who have responsibly recreated on public lands for decades.
We encourage the BLM to continue to engage the public in their deliberations on the disposition of public lands. Our members stand ready to serve as a resource for you and you further consider responsible public access to America’s public lands.
Thank you for your consideration of our request. We look forward to receiving your timely response to the questions and comments above.